It Really is Just a Matter of Perspective

While stumbling around on the internet looking for interesting articles to read, I happened upon these two slides in an article written by Derek Morrison called Technology Impeded Learning at Auricle – Learning Technologies In Higher Education. The slides are attributed to Martin Bean, from a recent slide show. I found them right on “point.”

Martin Bean 2009

Martin Bean 2009

Martin Bean 2009

Martin Bean 2009


Casting Your Net In Fertile Waters

Image by Ivan Walsh via Flickr

Still on the fence about whether or not to jump into the social media scene for business networking purposes? Nielson Claritas has just released an analysis of consumer behavior offering the conclusion that those using social networks like Facebook, Myspace or LinkedIn are more affluent and more urban than average. The numbers of site visitors are growing by the quarter. Depth of engagement also is increasing. The online panel from which Nielson culled its results numbers more than 200,000. Facebook and Linkedin pulled in the highest scale user. Check out the blurb at Nielsonwire.

I am not going to judge the veracity of these results as I do not nearly enough information about the testing and demographics of the study. Nonetheless, even if the numbers represent an approximation, I humbly suggest that your on-line audiences in these venues may well be interested in focused engagement regarding quality services.

Hat tip to Resource Shelf

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Computational Search and Your Retirement

Image via Wikipedia

Still wondering what to do with computational search engine WolframAlpha? How about calculating your retirement? Sure you get those statements every year from social security, but why not get an answer that takes into account your current investment strategy, and shows your retirement projections with nifty charts, graphs and distribution comparisons. Check out the WA blog entry on it here and check out the calculator here.

Related articles by Zemanta:
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

More Tools & Apps

You can never have enough of them. Particularly if they will help you run your business, solve your problems and make your job easier.

The ABA Journal has compiled a list of “70 Sizzling Apps” – lawyer-friendly helpers that run the gamut from word-smithing to productivity to accessibility to task management to fun and games (lawyers need a break too!).  Some apps, particularly in the latter category, do not really exhibit a clear connection to the practice of law, but they are all interesting and worthwhile to some degree.

Here is a sample of apps listed by the ABA article:

WaffleTurtle offers searchable iPhone apps of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ($2.99); Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure ($2.99); Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ($4.99); Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure ($2.99); Federal Rules of Criminal Proce­dure ($2.99); Federal Rules of Evidence ($2.99); Lanham Act ($2.99); local patent rules from seven federal district courts whose dockets attract great numbers of intellectual property cases ($2.99); Sarbanes-Oxley Act ($1.99); securities laws including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Invest­ment Company Act of 1940 and the Invest­ment Advis­ers Act of 1940 ($4.99); federal copyright code ($1.99); and federal patent laws ($2.99).

I was suprised to see that a few of my favorites didn’t make the list. One of these is reQall, a free iPhone app and companion web service  that beg for a $24 per year Pro subscription to keep track of your to do list. It’s quite ingenious: it takes emails or voice recordings of to-do list items, transcribes to text, organizes tasks by location or keywords, offers shared reminders with co-workers, friends or family, includes memory jogging functions, syncs with Google calendar and Outlook, and now sports a related items link that will sync reQall with Evernote and group items accordingly.

Whatever your preference in apps, there is no shortage to choose from, as the ABA so aptly points out!

Know Your Rights – Wherever You Are

Wests U.S. Constitution for iPhone

West's U.S. Constitution for iPhone

To the ever-growing list of mobile electronic legal resources, you can now add the United States Constitution. West Publishing has released the digital version of a Pocket Constition for iPhone / iPod Touch. The application, which costs 99 cents, offers the full text, a table of contents and audio of the text.

Interesting side note from West’s blog: I didn’t know that West created the original Pocket Constitution at the request of Chief Justice Warren Burger in the 1980s.

So, if you find yourself frequently engaged in constitutional arguments about rights to free speech or to bear arms or complex discussions regarding separation of church and state or the split of power between the branches of government, this app’s for you.

Suffering the Consequences of Incomprehensibility

1st third of 16th century
Image via Wikipedia

Haven’t posted one of these in the while. The ABA Journal reports here on another lawyer taking a beating from a judge for poor writing. The Dayton, Florida lawyer, David W. Glasser, was the attorney on the receiving end of U.S. District Judge Gregory Presnell’s ire. Apparently, Attorney Glasser filed a Motion to Dismiss with the District Court and Judge Presnell denied the Motion without prejudice. Attached to the Judge’s Denial is a copy of the original Motion complete with red editing marks. The Judge ordered Glasser to copy his client on the criticism.

I read the ABA’s blurb listing the grammatical errors pointed out by the Judge: several examples of excess spacing; typographical errors; incorrect placement of punctuation outside of quotation marks; incorrect capitalization; wrong word use; and, one very long sentence. Procedural errors aside, I thought to myself “sure, these are problems, but the Judge’s actions seem pretty harsh.” And then I read the example quoted by the Journal:

“A review counsel’s file subsequent to the court order indicates that for some reason full which counsel is unaware, the defendant named in the complaint was changed to the current defendant. Counsel believes this was changed by counsel’s prior assistant it was no longer with counsel’s firm.”

Whaaaat? Case closed.

[if you really want to, you can read the Motion here]

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Paper: A Thing Of The Past? No More Bound Rulings!

Arkansas state welcome sign
Image via Wikipedia

First prep school libraries and now state courts. The Arkansas Supreme and Appellate courts have announced the end of printed, bound opinions and rulings. The official versions of the court rulings will be found exclusively on-line, reports Arkansas news sources. In exchange for the more than $250,000 in annual savings, the Arkansas courts counter the hacker concern by assuring the public that there are sufficient safeguards in place to maintain the integrity of the rulings. Okay. The printings ended with the July, 2009 rulings. Trees in Arkansas have been cheering ever since.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Got Social Media Policy?

Blogging and Social Media Marketing workshop
Image by glenn.batuyong via Flickr

Are you an attorney or professional looking to develop a social media policy for your own enterprise or for that of a client? Do you know where to start?

At some point along your social media policy drafting journey, consider paying a visit to Social Media Governance where you will find a sizeable list of links to social media policies in actual use at various commercial and non-profit institutions and political subdivisions. The site is maintained by Chris Boudreaux, a former Naval officers who has led product development and business transformation initiatives at many large companies.

Check out this great list and stay up to date on the intersection of social media and business.

Hat tip to Resource Shelf

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Building A Better Pencil

Printing press from 1811, photographed in Muni...
Image via Wikipedia

Alerted this morning to a new book, A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers and the Digital Revolution by Professor Dennis Baron. Professor Baron appears to be providing the larger context to counter the argument that technology is destroying our ability to write.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist, or even a professor, to grasp that every meaningful innovation affecting writing (and perhaps every innovation period) has been met with some degree of skepticism, scorn, disdain, fear or anxiety from some sector. Every technology adds to and subtracts from the prior experience, forcing us into a perpetual cost-benefit analysis when faced with the choice of tools to apply to the writing trade.

So, how does that cost benefit analysis play out in the current digital writing environment? How are our students, immersed in short form blogging and texting, faring in more demanding intellectual writing pursuits? Well, never fear (or fear less), as Professor Baron suggests that these students grow out of their “childish” writing styles to address their audience appropriately when the time comes to do so. Just like some children are born to be writers, while others are not, technology ultimately should not hamper or hinder their efforts to communicate.

Hat tip to Legal Writing Prof Blog.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Data Security & Compliance

LA CANADA, CA - AUGUST 05:  Customers shop at ...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

I have notice a lot of attention paid lately to issues regarding data security and online privacy issues. Today, from a somewhat unlikely source, I read an article regarding some of the laws affecting how to handle data and privacy issues . David Perkins writes at the Insurance Journal about What to Know About Red Flags, Notification Laws and the Hi Tech Act. The article is not exhaustive, but it does offer a primer for the practitioner interested in where privacy laws are now and where they appear to be headed.

Perkins hits on the Hi-Tech Act, enacted as part of the Stimulus package, which establishes a federal layer of protection for patients. On the one hand, the Act mandates electronic transmission of more patient information, ostensibly to modernize the manipulation of medical information, while at the same time tightening up the notification process in the event of data breach.

Perkins also hits on a broad Massachusetts regulation enacted one year ago, 201 C.M.R. 17.00, which applies to persons anywhere who “own, license, store or maintain personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.” Protections are expanded under the regulation and fines can be imposed. At least 44 states have enacted their own data privacy and notification laws and regulations, with mechanisms for fines and penalties.

The “Red Flags Rule” also applies broadly to “financial institutions” and “creditors” with “covered accounts” and addresses the establishment of identity theft protection programs.

Coming down the road is the Data Accountability and Trust Act, which appears imminent. The Act contains notice requirements when data breaches occur and sensitive information is tapped.

The article does not deal with the ethical burdens and additional losses occasioned by data breach in the context of a legal practice. Client confidences are akin to patient privacy; in the case of legal representation, the potential downside of a breach may implicate both the data privacy and notice rules and professional codes of ethics.

While much of the data privacy and notice area remains uncharted, it certainly helps to understand the legislated concerns and the mechanics of how our electronic systems operate in order to assess and address the potential risks.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]